Sharia-based securities crowdfunding for environmental sustainability goals : practitioners’ perceptions, platform initiatives, and institutional performances

Abstract

This study explores the extent to which Sharia-Based Securities Crowdfunding (SBSC) platforms in Indonesia involve in environmental sustainability goals. Using a qualitative research approach, the study aims to evaluate the platforms’ perceptions, initiatives, and institutional performances related to environmental sustainability, particularly in the context of SBSC platforms. Primary data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with four key informants from three selected platforms with the highest distributed fund as of February 21, 2025—SHAFIQ, LBS Urun Dana, and Urun-RI. Secondary data were selectively obtained from official website publications of the selected platforms. The analysis was conducted using an inductive approach supported by NVivo to identify emerging themes. Findings show that SBSC platforms are developing awareness regarding environmental sustainability practices. Informants demonstrated knowledge of environmentally aligned business sectors, such as renewable energy, organic fertilize-based farming, waste management, and electric vehicles. Some platforms also associate environmental-related projects with national development strategies and Sustainable Development Goals. However, this conceptual understanding has not yet reflected in institutionalized criteria or structured mechanisms for environmental-related sustainability project evaluation. While one platform has taken proactive steps—such as implementing a ‘green label’ to mark SDG-aligned offerings—others have not yet adopted similar mechanisms. Collaborations with several communities and educational initiatives on green financing also indicate emerging engagement. However, these initiatives remain fragmented and largely informal across platforms. From an institutional performance perspective, the research highlights several limitations. None of the selected platforms apply sustainability-related criteria, nor do they offer incentives for environmentally sustainable projects. This also reflects their standard assessment of securities offerings. Informants also confirmed the absence of specified environmental impact evaluations, which indicated that green-related projects are evaluated using the same business-as-usual considerations as conventional ones. Furthermore, regulatory gaps and limited operational coverage were identified as barriers. In brief, growing awareness and early-stage initiatives toward environmental sustainability within SBSC platforms in Indonesia, these have not yet matured into systematic and institutionalized practices. Regulatory support, sustainability-based frameworks, and incentive mechanisms are necessary to elevate the role of SBSC in supporting SDGs, particularly in the context of environmental aspect.