Rectifying the downsides pension fund with the critical analysis of triangle justice ecosystem : a comparative case study in Indonesia and Malaysia

dc.contributor.authorFahmi Alamil Huda
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T03:13:56Z
dc.date.available2024-07-31T03:13:56Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-27
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this chapter is to redesign the Indonesian pension fund’s business model, management system, and new strategies to balance adequate profits, affordability, and sustainable programs. Consider the Malaysian pension system and adapt the INTERDAP application used by PT. Angkasa Pura II. Through this qualitative case study, we applied the foundations of the Triangle Sharia Justice Ecosystem (TSJE); Sharia, digitized the system, and supported green investment in the long run. By modeling the business strategy, facilitating the business model and supplier relationship management, and creating mutually beneficial management among stakeholders, the study found that Malaysia’s pension system has an investment purpose. Indonesia, on the other hand, provides pension loans only based on previously agreed cumulative contributions. Malaysia encourages people across the country to save on severance funds. The pension system is still managed conventionally. Malaysia requires a pension contribution of 23% of the employee’s base salary, while Indonesia requires only 3%. This will affect the contribution of pension funds to the GDP. Malaysia’s pension fund accounts for 60% of GDP. Besides, Indonesia is at only 6.03%. Another view is, to become a developed country, pension funds need to reach 60% of GDP by 2045 because 42% of the total supply of funds in the infrastructure sector comes from pension funds. The practical implications of this study are access to information, security, and transparency in the management of pension funds through a digital system supervised by the Sharia Regulator (BPS) and the Indonesian government’s efforts to realize that supports the green economy. This study integrates the foundations of the TSJE about pension funds management. The limitation of the research study is that more detailed studies and methods are needed to analyze this study. It is expected that this TSJE system will be applied further.
dc.identifier.citationHuda, F.A. (2023). Rectifying the Downsides Pension Fund with the Critical Analysis of Triangle Justice Ecosystem: A Comparative Case Study in Indonesia and Malaysia. In: Mansour, N., Bujosa Vadell, L.M. (eds) Islamic Sustainable Finance, Law and Innovation. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27860-0_17
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27860-0_17
dc.identifier.isbn9783031278600
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14576/248
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature Switzerland
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved/
dc.subjectLaw
dc.subjectBehavioural finance
dc.subjectIslamic Finance
dc.subjectInnovation
dc.subjectGreen Finance
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.subjectSustainable Finance
dc.subjectFinTech
dc.subjectFinancial innovation
dc.titleRectifying the downsides pension fund with the critical analysis of triangle justice ecosystem : a comparative case study in Indonesia and Malaysia
dc.typeBook chapter
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Accepted Manuscript.pdf
Size:
893.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.4 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: